What does it mean to photograph wildlife? Sitting (or lying) for hours in a hide or a blind? Careful stalking through the woods, practicing woodcraft handed down throughout the generations? Having a 500+mm lens that you cart around in a wheel barrow so that you can get right next to the bird or animal from a mile away? (The tripod needing to be specially reinforced to support the lenses weight.) Yes, there are times where all of this can pay off hugely with some magnificent shots, but it’s not always necessary to always go quite so gung-ho.
In fact, some of out best opportunities to take pictures of birds and animals don’t have to take place too far from home. And not all of the animals will necessarily be totally wild.Taking photographs of the deer that come to visit your yard can land a person some real keepers. And the birds that come to our feeders are still wild. The things that you need to consider when taking these photos is that by the background, you can sometimes tell if they are in a truly wild environment, or in the yard. Of course, sometimes the “wilderness” can be something much less than wilderness. Like when I found this Helmeted Guinea Fowl to photograph
The fact that it had to have escaped from someones yard and that it was obviously in a town didn’t stop me from shooting it (with the camera people). In fact, I rather enjoyed taking a picture of it investigating the trailer hitch of this truck. If I ever did try to use or sell these images to a publication however, I would disclose the fact that it is a domesticated bird. Likewise, if I am ever photographing an animal or bird that is somehow captive (even if only momentarily to apply a tracking band or for rehabilitation) I would still let the buyer know the fact. If by contrast I captured a nice image of a wild bird or deer in my yard, I don’t know that I would feel the need to disclose. They are still wild and being part of nature.
I used two lenses for these shots. A 70-200mm zoomed out to capture some of the town, so that people could place where the bird was, and then a 300mm lens with a 1.4x converter (I don’t quite need a wheelbarrow for it) to capture the closeups and details. For the 70-200 I used a slower shutter speed and therefore a lower ISO, since I wasn’t as worried about camera shake with this shorter lens (ISO 200 and 1/160). Aperture was f/8. For the longer lens I was concerned about camera shake, so I bumped ISO up to 400 and my shutter speed to 1/500. I also adjusted the aperture to f/5.6 to compensate for the faster shutter speed, but to also give me a shallower depth of field, since I wanted the focus to fade away from my elected point.
Anyone else out there have contrary or more defined feelings on disclosing how, when or where photographs were taken? Or concerns about disclosing details of photos? There are some things that I absolutely will not disclose, like the location of a nest. I don’t want people flocking to a nest and disturbing a bird when it needs its space or it will abandon its nest. I always want closeup nesting pictures, but I will not disturb the birds to get them (and so have no close up nest images even though I know where there are some magnificent nests).